Is Generative AI a Danger for Jobs or an Opportunity in 2026?
See what the International Labour Organization says about Generative AI
Written by: Rajeshwar Raj
This article shows the Impact of Generative AI on jobs and cites the findings of a study conducted by the International Labour Organization to shed light on whether it poses a threat or an opportunity to employment.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) possesses a propensity not for annihilation but rather the empowerment of jobs, as discerned through an illuminating study conducted by the esteemed International Labour Organization (ILO). This groundbreaking research firmly underscores that Generative AI’s true essence lies in its capacity to augment human labor, primarily by automating discrete tasks rather than orchestrating an outright usurpation of entire vocations. The study’s revelations illuminate a profound truth: the majority of professions and sectors merely teeter on the precipice of automation, poised to embrace innovation and thrive alongside the latest wave of Generative AI, exemplified by the remarkable ChatGPT.
In this epoch of technological metamorphosis, the paramount impact emanates not from the obliteration of jobs but from a trans-formative re-imagining of the very essence of work. It’s a reconfiguration that pertinently encompasses work intensity and autonomy, transcending the mere boundaries of mechanization. Within this landscape, the once-mighty bastion of clerical labor stands exposed, with nearly a quarter of its tasks subjected to heightened vulnerability, while over half assume a posture of moderate susceptibility. In stark contrast, occupational echelons comprising managers, professionals, and technicians exhibit only a marginal sliver of highly exposed responsibilities, with approximately a quarter occupying the realm of moderate exposure. This global odyssey of discovery, inclusive in its scope, lays bare the stark disparities etched into the fabric of nations across various stages of development. These disparities are inextricably linked to prevailing economic structures and the chasms of technological disparity. The study, a testament to its rigor, unveils an irrefutable truth: the specter of automation looms large over high-income nations, where approximately 5.5 percent of their workforce teeters on the precipice of technological upheaval.
Meanwhile, in the hallowed precincts of low-income nations, the risk of automation’s reach is a mere whisper, affecting only 0.4 percent of their labor force. Yet, here lies the crux: the potential for augmentation, a force that could potentially alter the destinies of nations, knows no borders or bias. As a beacon of hope, it stands poised to shine its trans-formative light across all countries. With the judicious implementation of astute policies, this burgeoning technological renaissance holds the promise of bestowing monumental benefits upon the developing world, a symphony of progress harmonizing across nations, a potent ode to the human spirit’s indomitable quest for advancement.
efforts contributed by: